...
NEWS

Global Mobility – Hiring Abroad

CJEU rules Belgian non-resident tax surcharge breaches EU law (Case C-119/24).
Share:

Table of Contents

On 12 March 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in Case C-119/24 (Chefquet), concluding that Belgium’s tax surcharge applied to non-resident taxpayers is incompatible with the EU principle of free movement of workers.

Background

The case originated from a request for a preliminary ruling by the Court of Appeal of Liège, concerning French residents taxed in Belgium on Belgian-source income. The dispute centred on a specific surcharge imposed exclusively on non-resident taxpayers under Belgian income tax law.

The referring court questioned whether this additional charge placed non-residents at a disadvantage compared to resident taxpayers, contrary to Article 45 TFEU.

The Court’s findings

The CJEU held that the Belgian surcharge constitutes a restriction on the free movement of workers.

In particular, the Court found that:

  • Applying an additional tax burden solely because a taxpayer is non-resident results in less favourable treatment compared to residents in a comparable situation.
  • Such a difference in treatment is liable to deter workers from exercising their right to cross-border employment within the EU.
  • The measure could not be justified by the arguments put forward, including the need to preserve the coherence of the tax system or ensure balanced allocation of taxing powers.

Key legal takeaway

The judgment confirms that Member States cannot impose targeted fiscal disadvantages on non-residents unless they are objectively justified and proportionate. In this case, the Court found that Belgium failed to meet that threshold.

Practical implications

National tax regimes: Member States operating differentiated tax surcharges for non-residents may need to amend their legislation.

Cross-border workers: The ruling strengthens protections against discriminatory tax treatment for individuals working across borders.

Employers: Companies with mobile workforces should reassess tax equalisation policies and payroll compliance in light of the decision.

If you need assistance with similar issues regarding labour law, social security, or tax issues, feel free to visit our Global Mobility page for more information and contact us via the dedicated forms.

Consultancy On Hiring Abroad

Regulatory Framework

Authority Source Number Article Type Date Link
Court of Justice of the European Union Case C-119/24 119/24 / Law 12/03/2026 Read more
EU Treaty on the functioning of the EU / 45 Law 01/12/2009 Read more
Belgian Government Income Tax Code 1992 / 245, 465-468 Law 28/12/1992 Read more
A&P related service:

Hiring Abroad

A&P supports companies in international hiring processes, providing coordinated legal, tax, and social security assistance aimed at mitigating compliance risks, optimising costs, and ensuring efficient and fully compliant management of cross-border employment relationships. 

Contact us for this service

Form ID: “521”

Complete the form to get a response from our experts

Full Name(Required)
Subject of the request(Required)
Number of the employees involved(Required)
E.g. employee’s duties, operational arrangements, company presence in the foreign jurisdiction, and any issues or concerns already identified.

Related Insights

No data was found

Related News

Labour Law
The Italian government is transposing the new EU Directive on Pay Transparency: Since the 7th June, the rules are in effect. Their goal is to reduce the gender pay gap...
Labour Law

Lithuania is positioning itself among the most advanced EU Member States in implementing the EU Pay Transparency Directive (Directive 2023/970/EU). In March 2026, the Lithuanian government approved draft amendments to...

Labour Law
Estonia moves towards a partial implementation of the EU Pay Transparency Directive, introducing key measures on salary transparency while delaying more complex reporting and job classification requirements....

More related Services