...
NEWS

Global Mobility – Megaprojects: EU legality between public tenders and sanctioned countries

On 12 February 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) clarified in Case C-313/24 whether Member States can grant public tenders to a company with an administrative board composed of citizens of a sanctioned country. 
Share:

Table of Contents

Background of the Case

The dispute arose in Italy and was referred to the CJEU by the Consiglio di Stato (Italy’s Council of State).

The Minister of Culture awarded a public tender to Scudieri International. Two of the three members of the administrative board of that company were Russian nationals. One of those members was also the sole administrator of Sielna SpA, the parent company of Scudieri International, incorporated under Italian Law.

Legal background

Article 5k of the EU Regulation 833/2014 provides the EU sanctions framework introduced in response to Russia’s actions in Ukraine. The provision restricts the award of public contracts to certain Russian entities or to companies acting on their behalf or under their direction.

Issue

Does the presence of Russian nationals on a company’s board automatically trigger a prohibition on awarding that company a public contract under EU sanctions law?

Ruling

The CJEU ruled that the mere nationality of board members is insufficient to bring a company within the scope of the sanctions prohibition.

Instead, contracting authorities must assess whether:

  • The individuals in question exercise effective control over the company; and
  • There is a real and demonstrable risk that public funds could directly or indirectly benefit a sanctioned person or entity (in this case, Russia).

The Court emphasized that sanctions must be applied based on substantive influence and control, not assumptions tied solely to citizenship.

Impact

Companies based in the EU can apply for public tenders even when their administrative board include persons with the nationality of a country from a sanctioned country.  Nonetheless, the company should ensure that this person does not represent a risk of a breach to the sanction.

For more information and assistance about similar issues, please visit our Global Mobility service page and feel free to contact us.

International Large – Scale Projects

Regulatory Framework

Authority Source Number Article Type Date Link
Court of Justice of the European Union Case C-313/24 / / Law 12/02/2026 Read more
EU Regulation 883/2014 883 5(1)(k) Law 31/07/2014 Read more

Contact us for this service

Form ID: “525”

Complete the form to get a response from our experts

Name(Required)
Company Name(Required)
Country of Headquarters(Required)
The project takes place(Required)
Expected duration of my project(Required)
The project involves(Required)

Related Insights

No data was found

Related News

Labour Law
The Italian government is transposing the new EU Directive on Pay Transparency: Since the 7th June, the rules are in effect. Their goal is to reduce the gender pay gap...
Labour Law

Lithuania is positioning itself among the most advanced EU Member States in implementing the EU Pay Transparency Directive (Directive 2023/970/EU). In March 2026, the Lithuanian government approved draft amendments to...

Labour Law
Estonia moves towards a partial implementation of the EU Pay Transparency Directive, introducing key measures on salary transparency while delaying more complex reporting and job classification requirements....

More related Services